...
Allocation level of QA analyst | Project maturity and recommendation | Preparation and Setup | Feature Sprints | UAT |
---|---|---|---|---|
Full time allocation (this should correspond to expected 1:2 ratio (1 QA Analyst for 2 CEs on the project)) | Pilot / New projects, full QA support for the customer is expected |
|
|
|
Half time allocation (this should correspond to about 35% - 40% of CE allocation for QA Analyst) | Pilot / New projects, basic QA support for the customer is expected Risk: As we don’t expect using X-Ray in this option, it can be difficult to share our test cases with the customer. The customer can get some examples, but he should know our support in this will be limited. |
|
|
|
12 hours a week (this should correspond to about 25% of CE allocation for QA Analyst) | Smaller project, QA Analyst will support internal Pfx team only, NO SUPPORT FOR THE CUSTOMER Risk: if the customer maturity in testing is low, without QA Analyst support it can lead to not prepared UAT tests, misunderstandings reported as bugs and project delay. |
|
|
|
8 hours a week (this should correspond to about 20% of CE allocation for QA Analyst) | Smaller project, QA Analyst will support internal Pfx team only, NO SUPPORT FOR THE CUSTOMER Risk: if the customer maturity in testing is low, without QA Analyst support it can lead to not prepared UAT tests, misunderstandings reported as bugs and project delay. |
|
|
|
4 hours a week - note this can be used just for next stage of existing project when QA Analyst was on the previous stage and therefore knows the project and the customer. DON’T USE THIS ALLOCATION FOR A NEW PROJECT!!! | Existing customer, ongoing project, small enhancements, no support to the customer Risk: For a new customer this option has no sense, it means NO QA Analyst on the project with all consequences as here there will be no QA support for the customer and for our internal Pfx team |
|
...